Chick-fil-A Supporters Are Not the One’s “Shoving It in People’s Faces”


Chick-fil-APlenty has been said on the Chick-fil-A controversy, and although I didn’t join the masses in yesterday’s food fest, I think their actions and motivations are being unfairly portrayed by a large swath of observers, including many who come at the marriage issue from their same perspective.

Case in point: this article, which has gained significant traction by arguing that supporting an under-fire business, particularly for biblical reasons, constitutes an undue act of aggression or uncharitableness toward one’s enemies:

But if love for Jesus is at the heart of this “appreciation day”, which I think that is the case, then the church’s response to their perceived persecution should be more like Jesus’ responses when he was persecuted or when he saw others persecuted.

He ate with them, talked peaceably with them, healed them, defended them, and when that didn’t work, he died for them.

For me, “shoving it in their face” just doesn’t seem like the response of the Jesus who said “turn the other cheek.” Even if you disagree vehemently with homosexuality and gay marriage, the response Jesus expects from you towards them and those that would decry your position is clear: love them.

Now, I’m all for eating with our enemies, etc. Of course we should love them. But we are talking about a business that was under attack from all sides, and we are talking about a movement that sought simply to “affirm” that business and support it in a season of ridicule and persecution. I know it’s become en vogue to idealize the bloodied church of Nero’s day as being nobler than America’s air-conditioned church subculture, but are we now also expected to sit silently by as our fellow brothers and sisters are set to flames?

As the Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day event page stated:

No one is being asked to make signs, speeches, or openly demonstrate. The goal is simple: Let’s affirm a business that operates on Christian principles and whose executives are willing to take a stand for the Godly values we espouse by simply showing up and eating at Chick Fil-A on Wednesday, August 1…

…There’s no need for anyone to be angry or engage in a verbal battle. Simply affirm appreciation for a company run by Christian principles by showing up on Wednesday, August 1 or by participating online – tweeting your support or sending a message on Facebook.

From what I’ve observed of yesterday’s goings on, I sense little more than this: affirmation and encouragement. These people aren’t “shoving it in people’s faces.” They are rallying around a company that was elevated as an object of scorn and derision by celebrities, politicians, and cultural elites who wrongly assumed that society would respond by simply rubbing their shoulders and saying “you tell those haters!” Participants see this as “appreciation” (shocker!), as telling Chick-fil-A, “we support you,” and we do so in a world where support for something as age-old and sacred as “man-woman marriage” is routinely accused of being founded in bigotry and hatred.

The irony abounds, from where I sit. Proponents of same-sex marriage continue to paint their ideological opponents as angry, aggressive sandwich tossers, even when it was their own post-modernistic, loosey-goosey, worship-at-the-altar-of-conformity cultural establishment that started this whole mess by persecuting a chicken shack with political threats. Where, when we observe the full scope of these events, does the the bigotry and uncharitable intolerance truly pool and fester?

It was Dan Cathy, Chick-fil-A’s president, who was asked about his views, and it was Cathy’s business that was subsequently discriminated against and threatened by mayors of major cities. To show distinct, energetic support for that business doesn’t constitute chucking a sandwich in others’ faces, and needn’t, I think, be detached from a willingness to say “after this is over, let’s find a way to sing kumbaya and work this out.” Why can’t we have both?

The remnant must rise up. The remnant must hold up the standard, and in ways far more profound than eating a chicken sandwich. “When everything has gone completely to the dogs,” as Albert Jay Nock wrote, “they are the ones who will come back and build up a new society.”

If coming out and eating a sandwich in solidarity is seen as an act of undue aggression or an uncharitable response to our eroding society’s persistent attempts to damage and disregard promoters of the truth, we’re going to be in pretty deep doo-doo when the real, substantive arguments and actions come to the table. If eating fast food is seen as crossing the line in public discourse, petty though such an act may be in the grander scheme of things, how will people react when we’re pressed to put down the fatty, breaded chicken and proclaim, with boldness, “what you’re promoting is evil”?

Only in today’s world, where the idol is blind inclusivity at all costs to morality, dignity, and human flourishing, would Americans rallying in solidarity around a persecuted, counter-cultural, biblical stance, particularly through something as mundane and peaceful as eating a sandwich, be seen as unbiblical aggressors.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/231056726214995968 Remnant Culture

    Chick-fil-A Supporters Aren't "Shoving It in People's Faces" http://t.co/Op92GgnF http://t.co/Op92GgnF @mattleeanderson @hunterbaker

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/231057363111669760 Joseph Sunde

    I have finally joined the fray on Chick-fil-A: Chick-fil-A Supporters Are Not the One’s “Shoving It in People’s Faces”: http://t.co/XsOBxzJ9

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/231065471884079105 Joseph Sunde

    You know society has "gone to the dogs" when eating chicken in solidarity is seen as uncharitable aggression. http://t.co/XsOBxzJ9

  • http://twitter.com/rjmoeller/status/231073810810544128 RJ Moeller

    You know society has "gone to the dogs" when eating chicken in solidarity is seen as uncharitable aggression. http://t.co/XsOBxzJ9

  • http://twitter.com/proudlywehail/status/231077065007452161 Donna Lynn

    You know society has "gone to the dogs" when eating chicken in solidarity is seen as uncharitable aggression. http://t.co/XsOBxzJ9

  • http://twitter.com/supertx/status/231078048324276226 Supertx

    Chick-fil-A Supporters Are Not the One’s “Shoving It in People’s Faces” http://t.co/oENlDuGF

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/231132634594562048 Remnant Culture

    Only in today’s world, where the idol is blind inclusivity, would Americans eating chicken be seen as aggressors. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/231220283493740545 Remnant Culture

    The remnant must rise up in ways more profound than eating chicken. But eating chicken isn't a bad place to start. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • http://twitter.com/wyladyk/status/231223844545904641 WyLadyK

    The remnant must rise up in ways more profound than eating chicken. But eating chicken isn't a bad place to start. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • http://twitter.com/lsfoster/status/231224451214221312 Linda Foster

    The remnant must rise up in ways more profound than eating chicken. But eating chicken isn't a bad place to start. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • http://twitter.com/rjmoeller/status/231270555943325696 RJ Moeller

    The remnant must rise up in ways more profound than eating chicken. But eating chicken isn't a bad place to start. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/231401446661316608 Joseph Sunde

    The remnant must rise up in ways more profound than eating chicken. But eating chicken isn't a bad place to start. http://t.co/Op92GgnF

  • Pingback: Juicy Links, 8/4/12 « Juicy Ecumenism

  • Michael Duenes

    Very well said.