The Least of These: People or Political Pawns?


Barack Obama, Jim Wallis, SojournersThe budget talks are a’blazin and Jim Wallis is at it again, rallying left-leaning Christians everywhere to support a laundry list of progressive “anti-poverty” programs (i.e. all of them).

On July 20, Wallis and 11 other “religious leaders” met with President Obama to ask for a “Circle of Protection” around any program ”focused on reducing poverty.” (“Circle of Protection”–is that Orwellian, New Age, or something out of a 1980s RPG?)

“We made our simple principle clear,” Wallis said. “The most vulnerable should be protected in any budget or deficit agreements…We told President Obama that this is what God requires of all of us.”

“This is what God requires of all of us”? You mean Medicaid, food stamps, and foreign “aid”? Inspiring, I do declare.

But, man, if we’re falling short on our redistributionist checklist, folks in the third-world must really need a sense of what God requires of them. Maybe Wallis can head over to Cuba or Zimbabwe and teach those tyrannical bullies a thing or two about how to properly manipulate and micro-manage their peoples toward greater prosperity. How I would love to see Wallis positioned in the former Soviet Union, trying to fix things by avoiding programs that “focus on reducing poverty” (i.e. everything).

As much as I appreciate Wallis’ attempt to intercede on my behalf, what God “requires of all of us” cannot be rolled into some quaint piece of legislation signed by Harry Reid or John Boehner. God’s “requirements” do not constitute a legalistic bullet list of progressive programs, and the church extends well beyond an “enlightened” majority with a tendency to sign and spend things quickly. (I’ve discussed this previously).

Why, for example, is our bloated, inefficient, fraud-laden Medicaid system the God-ordained method for helping America’s poor find healthcare in the 21st century? Why, might I ask, is such a system only God-ordained insofar as it remains untouched by budget cuts? If we cut the program by, say, 1% (or even .00001%), will judgment day come sooner or more harshly than it would otherwise? And to what degree? Paging Harold Camping…Al Gore?

What if I happen to disagree with page 3,500 of the legislation, but agree with the rest? What if I disagree with the whole thing and suggest a more “cutting-edge” alternative (I know, I know: “granny killer!”)? What if, on the other hand, God would rather I take my existing Medicaid “contribution” and donate it to the local church or a private charity? What if such funds would be better spent on kick-starting a new medical enterprise or investing in an upcoming pharmeceutical? What if God wants me to buy my own family health care for this particular week in this particular month of this particular year? Oh the greed.

Also, what constitutes Wallis’ view of an “anointed” government policy, and how does he come to such a view? Has he had a personal visitation from the Archangel Gabriel? Has the Holy Spirit led him to tweak Policy X by altering the verbiage on page 25 and fixing the numbers in Appendix B? Has he heard a “still small voice” telling him to coerce the nation into blind support of an unsustainable status quo? Have his pastor, church elders, and community of believers prayed and fasted energetically to come to this conclusion? Does his preferred “spiritual” approach align with a proper Biblical anthropology and systematic theology? Can he point to a verse that says, “Take X% from the Westerners and distribute it across Africa, using Y% for mosquito nets and Z% for condoms”?

From what I’ve read, Wallis makes no such claims, although he’d be much more persuasive if he did. After all, that is how God speaks to us, sans class warfare.

Instead, Wallis applies his own debased, materialistic, progressive worldview to Jesus’ call to serve the poor, and in doing so, anoints his aims with nothing more than the dirty oil of humanistic arrogance. This is what happens when we lose sight of Jesus’ radical call to follow him vs. ourselves. This is what happens when we lay claim to “love” on our terms and believe we can manufacture Compassion 17.0 and mandate it across the globe. This is why Jesus didn’t provide a detailed, point-by-point government plan for poverty elimination.

The whole point of obedience is intimate communion and discernment rooted in authentic, attentive, Biblical love. This is what is required for real and properly aligned human empowerment and the subsequent execution. This is what is required for true community and real, sustainable prosperity (did I say “real” yet?). And this, we must emphasize, is not what government was made for.

But then Wallis had to debase things further, grounding his comprehensive conclusions on — you guessed it — a single open-ended verse. (Acts 2:44 was likely his second choice.)

As Wallis states in his group’s “Circle of Protection Statement”: “We look at every budget proposal from the bottom up—how it treats those Jesus called ‘the least of these.’” (Matthew 25:45)

Ah yes, “from the bottom up” — that orientation through which the federal bureaucracy is known to function.

There I sit, waiting hours upon hours at the DMV, clutching my ticket with anticipation as I marvel over the “bottom-up” spirit that permeates the room. Sitting in my orange plastic chair, I gaze gleefully at the outdated monitor on the wall, waiting anxiously to see my number scroll across the marquee. (“There it is! #683! O wondrous, benevolent government!”) Approaching the counter, I behold the service-oriented spirit of that droopy-eyed, paper-pushing bureaucrat, whose groan and growl reminds me of that base beauty of humanity. Being thoroughly inspired, I generously pay $160 for permission to drive my own car. Blessings! Blessings! Bottoms up for blessings!

As all progressives do, Wallis commits the basic error of attaching his limited, earthbound, top-down scheming to his bottom-up, heartfelt desires. Through this warped, debased rendering of the Scripture, all that we thought we knew about Matthew 25 suddenly becomes robbed of its most basic message and meaning.

In the new version — the Jim Wallis Progressive Translation (JWPT?) — it might as well read like this:

“I tell you the truth, whatever limiting, impersonal, manipulative, enslaving, dehumanizing ‘anti-poverty’ programs you did not enact for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.”

Great! Let the cutting begin!

Whether Wallis likes it or not, he takes Jesus’ message about people and compassion and turns it into a message about politics and pressure, dragging in all the baggage that comes with it (and there’s a lot). The rich become sinners, the Right become unrighteous, the Left become holy, and the poor become political pawns in a contorted game of God-told-me-to-tell-you-so.

Wallis is certainly entitled to his view of what “God requires,” and we can certainly debate and disagree over which government “anti-poverty” programs are effective and which are necessary. But pairing the two in such a simplistic fashion is a terrible approach if we care anything about a unified church or a church in the first place (c.f. Ecumenical Babel). In Christ’s call to welcome the stranger, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and heal the sick, it seems doubtful he was trying to provoke us into a chicken fight over whose political vision is superior.

What Christ was doing was calling us to pursue radical abandonment and obedience to his will–the kind that exalts the one true God, rejects the materialism of this world, and transmits God’s transcendent mercy, grace, and loving kindness to all those who need it (i.e. everyone).

The United States government cannot accomplish this, and on judgment day, it will be Wallis and myself who stand before God, not page 6,935 of a Medicaid policy book that nobody read but everybody voted for.

No, not even if it says “anti-poverty” on the cover page in big, fat, red letters.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/95582922404401154 Remnant Culture

    Matthew 25 is about people & compassion. For Jim Wallis, it's about politics & pressure. Stop debasing Christ's mission: http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • http://twitter.com/qlovejoy/status/95584829235666944 qlovejoy

    Yep // RT @RemnantCulture: The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/zd3t9Dl #fb

  • http://twitter.com/jeffwrightjr/status/95589730405724160 Jeff Wright

    “This is what God requires of all of us”? You mean Medicaid, food stamps, and foreign “aid”? http://t.co/hOyoD9X

  • http://twitter.com/jeffwrightjr/status/95598330951897089 Jeff Wright

    "Why is bloated inefficient fraud-laden Medicaid God-ordained way 2 help U.S.’s poor find healthcare in 21st century?" http://t.co/hOyoD9X

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/95880895155810304 Joseph Sunde

    In the Jim Wallis Progressive Translation, the "least of these" are mere political pawns. How to debase the Gospel: http://t.co/pGMrsXW

  • http://twitter.com/silent0/status/95891925877538816 Ken Hood Jr.

    Christian leader uses "the least of these" as political pawns http://kch.me/ed (via @josephsunde)

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/95916548711120896 Remnant Culture

    For God saith, take X% from the Westerners & distribute it across Africa. Y% for mosquito nets & Z% for condoms! http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/96252775767347200 Remnant Culture

    @spencekenneth NIce piece. Here's my critique of the Circle of Protection: http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • http://twitter.com/spencekenneth/status/96279951992553472 Kenneth Spence

    anointed w/ the "dirty oil of humanistic arrogance" RT @RemnantCulture: Here's my critique of the Circle of Protection: http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/96294782636261376 Joseph Sunde

    RT @spencekenneth anointed w/ the "dirty oil of humanistic arrogance" RT @RemnantCulture Critique: Circle of Protection: http://t.co/pGMrsXW

  • http://twitter.com/frcdc/status/96325703829684224 FRC

    Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde at Remnant Culture. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://ow.ly/5OXi0

  • http://twitter.com/frcdc/status/96325703829684224 FRC

    Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde at Remnant Culture. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://ow.ly/5OXi0

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/96326977052606464 Joseph Sunde

    RT @FRCdc Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/0qqSs7Y

  • http://twitter.com/jeffwrightjr/status/96327148108906496 Jeff Wright

    RT @FRCdc Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/0qqSs7Y

  • http://twitter.com/ericteetsel/status/96329437393588226 Eric

    RT @FRCdc Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/0qqSs7Y

  • http://twitter.com/greendoopey/status/96331022525927425 Todd Dupler

    A great critique of Jim Wallis and the religious left via @josephsunde at Remnant Culture: http://t.co/8AXehZD h/t @frcdc

  • http://twitter.com/pastrcliff/status/96338672466665472 Cliff Lawson

    Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde at Remnant Culture. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://ow.ly/5OXi0

  • http://twitter.com/scrmbluaardvark/status/96357246774165504 Screaming Blue Aardv

    Thoughtful response to Jim Wallis via @josephsunde at Remnant Culture. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://ow.ly/5OXi0

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/96580825591709696 Remnant Culture

    RT @FRCdc Thoughtful response 2 Wallis via @josephsunde @ RemnantCulture. The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/xZnv1Wz

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/96609059372933121 Joseph Sunde

    @JonahNRO My thoughts on the Jim Wallis perversions, if you're interested: http://t.co/OkJsPcq

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/98397764119040000 Remnant Culture

    Jim Wallis warps the “least of these” into political tools & confuses bureaucratic blubber w/ genuine compassion. http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • http://twitter.com/jeffwrightjr/status/98443583035674624 Jeff Wright

    Jim Wallis warps the “least of these” into political tools & confuses bureaucratic blubber w/ genuine compassion. http://t.co/MGZqooj

  • Pingback: Atomic Communitarianism: The Control Freak’s Biggest Nightmare « Remnant Culture

  • Pingback: A Salvation Agenda: Rick Perry vs. the Religious Left « Remnant Culture

  • Pingback: Torah and Social Justice: Anchoring Prophet Rhetoric « Remnant Culture

  • http://twitter.com/terrigreenusa/status/155736557272305665 Terri Green

    RT @RemnantCulture: The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/buXkI04u

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/155752370586914816 Remnant Culture

    Read our #3 most-read post of 2011. http://t.co/P0e3EPI7

  • http://twitter.com/remnantculture/status/157577547637469184 Remnant Culture

    Our #4 most popular post of 2011: The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/91FbgLTB

  • http://twitter.com/valuesandcap/status/157577759038771200 Values & Capitalism

    Our #4 most popular post of 2011: The Least of These: People or Political Pawns? http://t.co/91FbgLTB

  • Pingback: For Unto Whom Much Is Given, Less Will Be Required « Remnant Culture

  • http://twitter.com/josephsunde/status/243536979583721472 Joseph Sunde

    Uh oh. Warren just pulled out the "least of these" verse. Jesus was not romanticizing the dole: http://t.co/xbPccI3k

  • http://twitter.com/ruthmalhotra/status/243544175184838657 Ruth Malhotra

    Uh oh. Warren just pulled out the "least of these" verse. Jesus was not romanticizing the dole: http://t.co/xbPccI3k